It seems like it. Are we really so pathetically
excited, so disturbingly interested in the negative sides of life? It seems to
be, for the simple reason that we are constantly fed fatalities, crashing cars,
airplanes, ships, mudslides, wars, terrorist attacks and the list is very long.
We lick it up from newspapers (remember those?), television and Internet news
programs; and they wouldn’t give us all this bad news if we were not reading,
listening or watching. So they keep bombarding us with a dominating percentage
of news that is bad – and that is not good news.
I do not watch television news-programs. The simple
reason is that I do not trust the information they give me. There is so much
obvious fluff and glorification, the eagerness of making their station and
program more so entertaining than informative; film at eleven. The way the
so-called anchor-people interact for the most part seems scripted, fake and
tried; to me it is simply embarrassing, disrespectful and a blatant insult to
the news they are supposed to cover, what really happened, the true information
we could be interested in and from which we no doubt would learn something
from.
Television news programs must obviously do well,
meaning that enough people are watching – otherwise these programs would not be
around; only the best, perhaps truest, would survive. So with the multitude of
stations (here in the USA), there is this innate “competition” to be the most
popular, so they all turn up the fluff to out-do their competitors. The news is
being padded and inflated; the graphics and the pictures are getting more
graphic – really. Under it all, the real news is buried, the news that might
actually have had a bigger impact on us, if communicated in a straight line.
But obviously bad news is good business, and that is
something the consumer (that would be you and I) obviously enjoy communicated.
Or is that really so? I mean, what is it we can learn from bad news, from so
MUCH bad news? You see, when we are being bombarded with endless fatalities,
accidents, murders, etc. we become numb to that kind of stimulation. One person
murdered is traumatic; a bus-load runs off the road and six people die – and
that is of course terrible; a plane disappears and we go: “oh well…”? And when
it’s hundreds or thousands of people vanishing due to war or terrorist attacks,
famine and so far away from us, we do become ignorantly numb, like it’s too
many and too much for us to comprehend – to care about? So where did our emotional
judgment go?
Movies, television shows and most certainly
video-games, underline the underbelly of society. There are too many guns and
knives, so much shooting and blood, way many explicit and violent deaths, multitude
of body parts flying all over the place. Yes, we (try to) acknowledge that this
is just a movie, a show or a video-game - it is not real. But the gruesome fact
is that we are still deeply affected by all this ‘not real’ stuff, so when it’s
a ‘real’ local murder, the bus off the road, the wars and all that death, we do
not react like we really should – with a much deeper compassion and concern and
a much stronger urge to ‘get it fixed’, one way or another.
Sure I’m no Sigmund Freud (luckily, I don’t even
look like him), but common sense dictates that our emotions with respect to the
violent side of society, the way we might find ourselves ignorant more so than
concerned, is a way to ‘protect’ ourselves for not going crazy; the “I’m glad
it wasn’t me” syndrome. And I’m (disturbingly) okay with that, feeling
“protected” that way to some extent.
But at times I am thoroughly influenced by some of
this sad bad news. Several years ago I read about a young woman driving along a
highway. She was reaching for a CD in the back-seat, for a split second not
seeing where she was going. The car veered to the right and unto the side of
the road, where four bicyclists were hit, mowed down and killed. Something we
cannot and must not be flippant about – and news sources shouldn’t either.
I often think about this horrific accident, these
two couples and best of friends, in their 50’s or so, enjoying a day together,
getting exercise and fresh air – then brutally having their lives ended – while
doing absolutely nothing wrong. Many times when I pass bicyclists on the side
of the road, I see those four friends, and also think of the young woman who
has to think about that moment, those people over and over the rest of her life
– as well as so many other people who suffered and keep suffering; children, grandchildren,
brothers and sisters, family and friends – on both sides; just so horrific. So
I drive with more care – I really do.
In our everyday lives, are we more inclined to think
‘negative’ than ‘positive’? Do we more so dwell on other people’s bad luck than
on their good fortune? Concerning good fortune for others, is the mixture of
envy, jealousy and ‘why didn’t I win the lottery’ dominant? We do not
voluntarily admit to such thoughts; instead we underline our full support and
rejoice in somebody’s good fortune and luck (winning the bloody lottery) – and
I really trust that we mean it; the good part.
When we hear of other peoples bad luck, I don’t
think we feel good about it. I think that what is happening with us, is more so
the feeling of momentary relief. Somebody is getting a divorce, got their car
smashed up, and the list is long – bad stuff happening to other people, so we
are simply relieved that it is not us – and then, for the most part, we do
sympathize.
So it’s not that we are gloating when bad things happen
to people around us, but it’s that brief relief, acknowledging that it didn’t
happen to us; and I find that very okay and rather human, actually.
When real bad news hit close to home and disasters
far away, I fully trust and believe that we are truly very compassionate as we
really do care for people around us, even those we didn’t particularly care for
before whatever happened; I see this again and again, and that is very
encouraging – has always been.
As much as ‘bad news’ seekers we might be, the good thing
is that when it really counts, we do stand up and acknowledge the true sadness,
the sorrow and unfortunate reasons; and then we do become understanding, caring
and supportive – all in the name of the human spirit, and we might even have learned a thing or two; I think that is certainly
good news – for all of us… Don’t you agree?
Too bad we couldn't clone Walter Cronkite! He was the real deal.
ReplyDeleteOur culture is ruled by the bottom line: what sells is what's important.
You are absolutely right.
How do we change that?
The good news and the bad news concerning changing the concept to 'the real deal' is, that it has to come from you and from me and from all of us individually. The good news is that we want to do better, be more 'real'; the bad news is that not many of us want to actively do something about it - as life goes on and the numbness has already set in.
DeleteSo it has to start from home, but our lives are busy and some things are left alone, no matter what the bottom line is fishing for. But I truly believe that we are NOT ignorant (or pathetic) to the point that we don't KNOW what's going on - it's just our full daily schedules and the part of getting off our butts to do something about it.
Thanks for your comment :)